Difference between revisions of "Faux Genders"

From FireSpeakerWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(The Chart: Moved cloud and valley to 3rd declension)
(The Chart: +dust & powder (jer))
 
(14 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 24: Line 24:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|style="font-weight: bold;" | edge, border
 
|style="font-weight: bold;" | edge, border
| class="fem" | ora, orae (''1f'')
+
| class="fem" | ōra, ōrae (''1f'')
 
|
 
|
 
| class="fem" | a orla
 
| class="fem" | a orla
Line 41: Line 41:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|style="font-weight: bold;" | nose
 
|style="font-weight: bold;" | nose
| class="masc" | nasus, nasi (''2m'')
+
| class="masc" | nāsus, nāsī (''2m'')
 
|
 
|
 
| class="masc" | o nariz
 
| class="masc" | o nariz
 
| class="masc" | o nariz
 
| class="masc" | o nariz
| class="fem" | l a nariz
+
| class="fem" | la nariz
 
| class="masc" | el nas
 
| class="masc" | el nas
 
|
 
|
Line 56: Line 56:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|style="font-weight: bold;" | journey, voyage
 
|style="font-weight: bold;" | journey, voyage
| class="masc" | viaticus, viatici (''2m'')
+
| class="masc" | viāticus, viāticī (''2m'')
 
|
 
|
 
| class="fem" | a viagem
 
| class="fem" | a viagem
Line 64: Line 64:
 
|
 
|
 
| class="masc" | le voyage
 
| class="masc" | le voyage
|
+
| class="masc" | l'viage
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 71: Line 71:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|style="font-weight: bold;" rowspan="2" | glass
 
|style="font-weight: bold;" rowspan="2" | glass
| class="neut" rowspan="2" | vitrum, vitri (''2n'')
+
| class="neut" rowspan="2" | vitrum, vitrī (''2n'')
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
 
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | o vidro
 
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | o vidro
Line 100: Line 100:
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
 
| class="fem" rowspan="2" | l'oreille (''fem'')
 
| class="fem" rowspan="2" | l'oreille (''fem'')
 +
| class="fem" rowspan="2" |l'ouothelle (''fem'')
 +
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |orêle (?)
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
+
| class="masc" | l'orecchio (''masc'')<ref name="orecchio"> This is one of several irregular plural formations in Italian.  More common irregular formations in Italian appear with a masculine singular noun ending in ''-o,'' which changes to a feminine noun in the plural with its ending in ''-a''.  Examples of these "plurali irregolari" are: ''il braccio-le braccia, il ciglio-le ciglia, il labbro-le labbra, l'uovo (m)-le uova, il dito-le dita, il riso-le risa ('laughter'), l'osso (m)-le ossa, il ginocchio-le ginocchia, ''etc.  Interestingly enough, Polinsky and Van Everbroek inform us that ''lèvre'' in Old French was variable - sometimes masculine, sometimes feminine - while, in modern French, ''lèvre'' 'lip' is feminine (“Development of Gender Classifications: Modeling the Historical Change from Latin to French”, <u>Language</u>, 79.2 (Jun., 2003): 356-90).  It should be further noted that ''la deda'' in dialectal Spanish (the feminine of ''el dedo'' 'the finger') refers to the thumb.  This structure, along with more common/acceptable variants such as ''il brazo/la braza'' 'the arm/the fathom' (both singular grammatically and semantically) and other such pairs, demonstrates the way in which Spanish deals with the loss of the neuter, as well as semantic differences regarding size.  This is discussed more thoroughly in Werner Wandersleben's article "Sobre el Femenino Aumentativo", in <u>RLA</u>, 19 (1981), 9-18.</ref>
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
 
| class="masc" | l'orecchio (''masc'')<ref name="orecchio"> This is one of several irregular plural formations in Italian.  More common irregular formations in Italian appear with a masculine singular noun ending in -o, which changes to a feminine noun in the plural with its ending in -a.  Examples of these "plurali irregolari" are: il braccio-le braccia, il ciglio-le ciglia, il labbro-le labbra, l'uovo (m)-le uova, il dito-le dita, il riso-le risa ('laughter'), l'osso (m)-le ossa, il ginocchio-le ginocchia, etc.  Interestingly enough, Polinsky and Van Everbroek inform us that ''lèvre'' in Old French was variable - sometimes masculine, sometimes feminine - while, in modern French, ''lèvre'' 'lip' is feminine (“Development of Gender Classifications: Modeling the Historical Change from Latin to French”, <u>Language</u>, 79.2 (Jun., 2003): 356-90).  It should be further noted that ''la deda'' in dialectal Spanish (the feminine of ''el dedo'' 'the finger') refers to the thumb.  This structure, along with more common/acceptable variants such as ''il brazo/la braza'' 'the arm/the fathom' (both singular grammatically and semantically) and other such pairs, demonstrates the way in which Spanish deals with the loss of the neuter, as well as semantic differences regarding size.  This is discussed more thoroughly in Werner Wandersleben's article "Sobre el Femenino Aumentativo", in <u>RLA</u>, 19 (1981), 9-18.</ref>
 
 
| class="fem" rowspan="2" | orija
 
| class="fem" rowspan="2" | orija
 
|-
 
|-
Line 109: Line 109:
 
| class="fem" | le orecchie
 
| class="fem" | le orecchie
 
|-
 
|-
|style="font-weight: bold;" rowspan="2" | flower<ref name=flower>According to Rolhfs, the case of ''flos, floris (m)'' adopting questionable gender in modern Romance languages has to do with the same factors that cause abstract Latin nouns in ''-or'' from the third declension to illustrate the same sorts of issues.  He cites the fact that this word in modern Romances has the semantic value of both 'flower' and 'blossom', and suggests that ''flos'' is therefore not completely concrete.  Thus, he makes a case for the classification of ''flos, floris'' as abstract ("Aspects du latin vulgaire examiné à travers la géographie linguistique", <u>Travaux de Linguistique et de Litterature</u>, 17.1 (1979), 7-25).  See the footnote following ''fleur'' for a different approach.</ref>
+
|style="font-weight: bold;" rowspan="2" | flower<ref name=flower>According to Rolhfs, the case of ''flōs, flōris (m)'' adopting questionable gender in modern Romance languages has to do with the same factors that cause abstract Latin nouns in ''-or'' from the third declension to illustrate the same sorts of issues.  He cites the fact that this word in modern Romances has the semantic value of both 'flower' and 'blossom', and suggests that ''flōs'' is therefore not completely concrete.  Thus, he makes a case for the classification of ''flōs, flōris'' as abstract ("Aspects du latin vulgaire examiné à travers la géographie linguistique", <u>Travaux de Linguistique et de Litterature</u>, 17.1 (1979), 7-25).  See the footnote following ''fleur'' for a different approach.</ref>
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | flos, floris (''3m'')
+
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | flōs, flōris (''3m'')
 
| class="fem" | floare (''fem'')
 
| class="fem" | floare (''fem'')
 
| class="fem" rowspan="2" | a flor
 
| class="fem" rowspan="2" | a flor
Line 117: Line 117:
 
| class="fem" rowspan="2" | la flor
 
| class="fem" rowspan="2" | la flor
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
| class="fem" rowspan="2" | la fleur<ref name=''fleur''>Many abstract words with the accusative singular in ''-orem'' became feminine in French (e.g., ''dolor (masc)'' > ''douleur (fem)'').  The nonabstract 'flower' supposedly followed suit, according to historical grammars, which appeal to analogy and abstractness.  Polinsky and Van Everbroek suggest that a better explanation would be analogy to nonabstract feminine nouns in ''-orem'' that occur with high frequency, e.g., ''suror'' 'sister', and ''uxor'' 'spouse' (“Development of Gender Classifications: Modeling the Historical Change from Latin to French”, <u>Language</u>, 79.2 (Jun., 2003): 356-90).</ref>
+
| class="fem" rowspan="2" | la fleur<ref name=''fleur''>Many abstract words with the accusative singular in ''-ōrem'' became feminine in French (e.g., ''dolor (masc)'' > ''douleur (fem)'').  The nonabstract 'flower' supposedly followed suit, according to historical grammars, which appeal to analogy and abstractness.  Polinsky and Van Everbroek suggest that a better explanation would be analogy to nonabstract feminine nouns in ''-orem'' that occur with high frequency, e.g., ''soror'' 'sister', and ''uxor'' 'spouse' (“Development of Gender Classifications: Modeling the Historical Change from Latin to French”, <u>Language</u>, 79.2 (Jun., 2003): 356-90).</ref>
 
| class="fem"  rowspan="2"| la flieur
 
| class="fem"  rowspan="2"| la flieur
 
| class="fem" rowspan="2" | la flleur
 
| class="fem" rowspan="2" | la flleur
Line 128: Line 128:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|style="font-weight: bold;" rowspan="2" | colour
 
|style="font-weight: bold;" rowspan="2" | colour
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | color, coloris (''3m'')
+
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | color, colōris (''3m'')
 
| class="fem" | culoare (''fem'')
 
| class="fem" | culoare (''fem'')
 
| class="fem" rowspan="2" | a cor
 
| class="fem" rowspan="2" | a cor
 
| class="fem" rowspan="2" | a cor
 
| class="fem" rowspan="2" | a cor
 
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | el color<ref name="colorcalor">According to Ralph Penny (<u>A History of the Spanish Language</u>, Cambridge: University Press (2002), 125), Spanish 'calor' and 'color' were usually feminine in Old Spanish but revert to masculine after the Golden Age.  Penny also mentions that these two nouns remain feminine in regional speech.</ref>
 
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | el color<ref name="colorcalor">According to Ralph Penny (<u>A History of the Spanish Language</u>, Cambridge: University Press (2002), 125), Spanish 'calor' and 'color' were usually feminine in Old Spanish but revert to masculine after the Golden Age.  Penny also mentions that these two nouns remain feminine in regional speech.</ref>
| class="masc" | el color<ref name="catalanella">Zenenko states that nouns ending in <i>-orem</i> (in the accusative) are generally masculine in Latin but often develop into feminine nouns in Ibero-Romance.  However, in the case of Catalan, these nouns are almost exclusively masculine in the spoken language, with the feminine equivalent appearing more and more in formal writing (“Acerca de la manifestación del género de los sustantivos y adjetivos como categoría grammatical en las lenguas romances ibéricas”, <u>Verba</u>, 10.1 (1983): 231-247).</ref>  
+
| class="masc" | el color<ref name="catalanella">Zenenko states that nouns ending in <i>-ōrem</i> (in the accusative) are generally masculine in Latin but often develop into feminine nouns in Ibero-Romance.  However, in the case of Catalan, these nouns are almost exclusively masculine in the spoken language, with the feminine equivalent appearing more and more in formal writing (“Acerca de la manifestación del género de los sustantivos y adjetivos como categoría grammatical en las lenguas romances ibéricas”, <u>Verba</u>, 10.1 (1983): 231-247).</ref>  
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
 
| class="fem" rowspan="2" | la couleur
 
| class="fem" rowspan="2" | la couleur
Line 146: Line 146:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|style="font-weight: bold;" rowspan="2"  | pain
 
|style="font-weight: bold;" rowspan="2"  | pain
| class="masc" rowspan="2"  | dolor, doloris (''3m'')
+
| class="masc" rowspan="2"  | dolor, dolōris (''3m'')
 
| class="fem" rowspan="2"  | durere (''fem'')
 
| class="fem" rowspan="2"  | durere (''fem'')
 
| class="fem" rowspan="2"  | a dor
 
| class="fem" rowspan="2"  | a dor
Line 154: Line 154:
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2"  |
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2"  |
 
| class="fem" rowspan="2"  | la douleur
 
| class="fem" rowspan="2"  | la douleur
| class="nogender" rowspan="2"  |
+
| class="fem" rowspan="2"  | la douleu
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2"  |
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2"  |
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2"  |
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2"  |
Line 163: Line 163:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|style="font-weight: bold;" rowspan="2" | bridge
 
|style="font-weight: bold;" rowspan="2" | bridge
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | pons, pontis (''3m'')
+
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | pōns, pontis (''3m'')
 
| class="fem" | punte (''fem'')
 
| class="fem" | punte (''fem'')
 
| class="fem" rowspan="2" | a ponte
 
| class="fem" rowspan="2" | a ponte
Line 171: Line 171:
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
 
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | le pont
 
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | le pont
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
+
| class="masc" rowspan="2" |l'pont
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
 
| class="fem" rowspan="2" | la punt
 
| class="fem" rowspan="2" | la punt
Line 181: Line 181:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|style="font-weight: bold;" | tooth
 
|style="font-weight: bold;" | tooth
| class="masc" | dens, dentis (''3m'')
+
| class="masc" | dēns, dentis (''3m'')
 
| class="masc" | dinte (''masc'')<ref name=dinte>According to Perkowski and Vrabie, this fits into three different semantic groups of the uncommon masculine inanimates in Romanian.  That is, it fits into the groups related to bilaterality, anatomy, and implanted and hanging verticality.  Vrabie and Perkowski also mention that the structure ''dinte/dinṭi'' shows an ending pattern that occurs frequently in animate masculine nouns and in adjectives, thus containing many aspects that maintain its grammatical gender.  See footnote for ''nuor'' for bibliographic information.</ref>
 
| class="masc" | dinte (''masc'')<ref name=dinte>According to Perkowski and Vrabie, this fits into three different semantic groups of the uncommon masculine inanimates in Romanian.  That is, it fits into the groups related to bilaterality, anatomy, and implanted and hanging verticality.  Vrabie and Perkowski also mention that the structure ''dinte/dinṭi'' shows an ending pattern that occurs frequently in animate masculine nouns and in adjectives, thus containing many aspects that maintain its grammatical gender.  See footnote for ''nuor'' for bibliographic information.</ref>
 
| class="masc" | o dente
 
| class="masc" | o dente
Line 189: Line 189:
 
|
 
|
 
| class="fem" | la dent<ref name=dent>According to Rohlfs 1979, this phenomenon can be explained thusly: ''la dent'' developed as a feminine noun due to the influence of MOLA 'molar' and was reinforced by the feminine MENS, MENTIS, which has the same structure in the declension paradigm.</ref>
 
| class="fem" | la dent<ref name=dent>According to Rohlfs 1979, this phenomenon can be explained thusly: ''la dent'' developed as a feminine noun due to the influence of MOLA 'molar' and was reinforced by the feminine MENS, MENTIS, which has the same structure in the declension paradigm.</ref>
|
+
| class="fem" | la dent
|
+
| class="fem" | la dent
 
|
 
|
 
| class="masc" | il dente
 
| class="masc" | il dente
Line 204: Line 204:
 
|
 
|
 
| class="masc" | le pouce
 
| class="masc" | le pouce
|
+
| class="masc" | l'pouce <ref name=pouce>This is almost certainly a borrowing from French; "pouoche" is the expected Jèrriais form</ref>
|
+
| pouoche (?)<ref name=pouoche>"Ou"(/u/) would be expected here, instead of "ouo" (/wo/).</ref>
 
| class="masc" | il polesch
 
| class="masc" | il polesch
 
| class="masc" | il pollice
 
| class="masc" | il pollice
Line 229: Line 229:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|style="font-weight: bold;" | salt
 
|style="font-weight: bold;" | salt
| class="masc" | sal, salis (''3m'')
+
| class="masc" | sāl, salis (''3m'')
 
| class="fem" | sare (''fem'')
 
| class="fem" | sare (''fem'')
 
| class="masc" | o sal
 
| class="masc" | o sal
Line 237: Line 237:
 
|
 
|
 
| class="masc" | le sel
 
| class="masc" | le sel
|
+
| class="masc" | l'sé
|
+
| saé (?)
 
| class="masc" | il sal
 
| class="masc" | il sal
 
| class="masc" | il sale
 
| class="masc" | il sale
Line 244: Line 244:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|style="font-weight: bold;" rowspan="2" | labor, task, ploughing
 
|style="font-weight: bold;" rowspan="2" | labor, task, ploughing
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | labor, laboris (''3m'')
+
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | labor, labōris (''3m'')
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
 
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | o lavouro
 
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | o lavouro
Line 252: Line 252:
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
 
| class="masc" | le labeur
 
| class="masc" | le labeur
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
+
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | l'boulais
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
Line 269: Line 269:
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
 
| class="fem" | la poussière
 
| class="fem" | la poussière
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
+
| class="nogender" | la poussiéthe; l'ponsi
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
Line 275: Line 275:
 
| class="fem" rowspan="2" | piuere
 
| class="fem" rowspan="2" | piuere
 
|-
 
|-
| class="fem" | la poudre
+
| class="fem" | la poudre | class="fem" | la poudre
 
|-
 
|-
 
|style="font-weight: bold;" rowspan="2" | end
 
|style="font-weight: bold;" rowspan="2" | end
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | finis, finis (''3m, i-stem'')
+
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | fīnis, fīnis (''3m, i-stem'')
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
 
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | o fim
 
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | o fim
Line 286: Line 286:
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
 
| class="fem" rowspan="2" | la fin
 
| class="fem" rowspan="2" | la fin
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
+
| class="fem" rowspan="2" |la fin
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
+
| class="fem" rowspan="2" |la fin
 
| class="fem" rowspan="2" | la fin
 
| class="fem" rowspan="2" | la fin
 
| class="fem" | la fine
 
| class="fem" | la fine
Line 297: Line 297:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|style="font-weight: bold;" rowspan="2" | sweat
 
|style="font-weight: bold;" rowspan="2" | sweat
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | sudor, sudoris (''3m'')
+
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | sūdor, sūdōris (''3m'')
 
| class="fem" rowspan="2" | sudoare ''fem'')
 
| class="fem" rowspan="2" | sudoare ''fem'')
 
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | o suor
 
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | o suor
Line 315: Line 315:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|style="font-weight: bold;" rowspan="2" | warmth, heat
 
|style="font-weight: bold;" rowspan="2" | warmth, heat
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | calor, caloris (''3m'')
+
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | calor, calōris (''3m'')
 
| class="fem" rowspan="2" | căldură ''fem'')
 
| class="fem" rowspan="2" | căldură ''fem'')
 
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | o calor
 
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | o calor
Line 332: Line 332:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|style="font-weight: bold;" | cloud
 
|style="font-weight: bold;" | cloud
| class="fem" | nubes, nubis (''3f'')
+
| class="fem" | nūbēs, nūbis (''3f'')
 
| class="masc" | nour (masc)<ref name=nuor>This fits into Vrabie and Perkowski's "celestial entites" semantic category, as part the paradigm for masculine inanimate Romanian nouns.  Most inanimates are neuter in Romanian.  (For further information, see their article "Covert Semantic and Morphophonemic Categories in the Romanian Gender System" in the <u>Slavic and East European Journal</u>, 30.1 (Spring 1986): 54-67.)</ref>
 
| class="masc" | nour (masc)<ref name=nuor>This fits into Vrabie and Perkowski's "celestial entites" semantic category, as part the paradigm for masculine inanimate Romanian nouns.  Most inanimates are neuter in Romanian.  (For further information, see their article "Covert Semantic and Morphophonemic Categories in the Romanian Gender System" in the <u>Slavic and East European Journal</u>, 30.1 (Spring 1986): 54-67.)</ref>
 
| class="fem" | a nuvem
 
| class="fem" | a nuvem
Line 347: Line 347:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|style="font-weight: bold;" rowspan="2" | valley
 
|style="font-weight: bold;" rowspan="2" | valley
| class="fem" rowspan="2" | valles, vallis (''3f'')
+
| class="fem" rowspan="2" | vallēs, vallis (''3f'')
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
 
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | o vale
 
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | o vale
Line 371: Line 371:
 
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | el arbre
 
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | el arbre
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | l'arbre (''masc'')<ref name=''arbre''>According to Polinsky & Van Everbroek, the traditional view of the development of <i>l'arbre (masc)</i> is the following: when tree names in Latin (which were feminine and ended in ''-us'') became masculine nouns due to their similarities with second declension masculine nouns, Old French ''arbor'' became masculine by analogy.  The authors, however, believe that a more plausible explanation would be that ''arbor'' became masculine around the same time that many nonabstract Latin nouns in ''-orem'' became masculine in early Old French.  However, the majority of such nouns started as neuter in Latin.  For example, <i>Lat. cor > OFr. coeur</i> 'heart' (“Development of Gender Classifications: Modeling the Historical Change from Latin to French”, <u>Language</u>, 79.2 (Jun., 2003): 356-90).</ref>
+
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | l'arbre (''masc'')<ref name=''arbre''>According to Polinsky & Van Everbroek, the traditional view of the development of <i>l'arbre (masc)</i> is the following: when tree names in Latin (which were feminine and ended in ''-us'') became masculine nouns due to their similarities with second declension masculine nouns, Old French ''arbor'' became masculine by analogy.  The authors, however, believe that a more plausible explanation would be that ''arbor'' became masculine around the same time that many nonabstract Latin nouns in ''-ōrem'' became masculine in early Old French.  However, the majority of such nouns started as neuter in Latin.  For example, <i>Lat. cor > OFr. coeur</i> 'heart' (“Development of Gender Classifications: Modeling the Historical Change from Latin to French”, <u>Language</u>, 79.2 (Jun., 2003): 356-90).</ref>
 
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | l'arbre (''masc''); l'bouais
 
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | l'arbre (''masc''); l'bouais
 
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | l'âbre (''masc'')
 
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | l'âbre (''masc'')
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
 
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | l'albero (''masc'')
 
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | l'albero (''masc'')
| class="fem" | árbures<ref name=''arbures''>This noun appears in Gerhard Rohlf's article "Aspects du latin vulgaire examiné à travers la géographie linguistique", published in <u>Travaux de Linguistique et de Litterature</u>, 17.1 (1979).</ref>
+
| class="fem" | árbures<ref name=''arbures''>This noun appears in Gerhard Rohlf's article "Aspects du latin vulgaire examiné à travers la géographie linguistique", published in <u>Travaux de Linguistique et de Littérature</u>, 17.1 (1979).</ref>
 
|-
 
|-
 
| class="masc" | a(l/r)bure
 
| class="masc" | a(l/r)bure
Line 399: Line 399:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|style="font-weight: bold;" | custom
 
|style="font-weight: bold;" | custom
| class="fem" | consuetudo, consuetudinis (''3f'')
+
| class="fem" | cōnsuētūdō, cōnsuētūdinis (''3f'')
 
|
 
|
 
| class="masc" | o costume
 
| class="masc" | o costume
Line 414: Line 414:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|style="font-weight: bold;" | origin
 
|style="font-weight: bold;" | origin
| class="fem" | origo, originis (''3f'')
+
| class="fem" | orīgō, orīginis (''3f'')
 
| class="fem" | origine (''fem'')
 
| class="fem" | origine (''fem'')
 
| class="fem" | a origem
 
| class="fem" | a origem
Line 423: Line 423:
 
| class="fem" | l'origine (''fem'')
 
| class="fem" | l'origine (''fem'')
 
|
 
|
|
+
| l'origine (?)
 
|
 
|
 
| class="fem" | l'origine (''fem'')
 
| class="fem" | l'origine (''fem'')
Line 429: Line 429:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|style="font-weight: bold;" | hail
 
|style="font-weight: bold;" | hail
| class="fem" | grando, grandinis (''3f'')
+
| class="fem" | grandō, grandinis (''3f'')
 
|
 
|
 
| class="masc" | o granizo
 
| class="masc" | o granizo
Line 451: Line 451:
 
| class="fem" | la llet
 
| class="fem" | la llet
 
| class="masc" | lach
 
| class="masc" | lach
| class="masc" | le lait
+
| class="masc" | le lait<ref name=lait>According to Polinsky and Van Everbroek, ''lacte'' was commonly used in Late Latin and was eventually reinterpreted as standing for ''lactem'' (especially as the final -m was weakened).  A masculine noun ''lactis'' could have then been formed by analogy ("Development of Gender Classifications: Modeling the Historical Change from Latin to French", <u>Language</u>, 79.2 (Jun., 2003), 356-90).</ref>
 
| class="masc" | l'lait
 
| class="masc" | l'lait
 
|
 
|
Line 459: Line 459:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|style="font-weight: bold;" rowspan="2" | sea
 
|style="font-weight: bold;" rowspan="2" | sea
| class="neut" rowspan="2" | mar, maris (''3n'')
+
| class="neut" rowspan="2" | mare, maris (''3n'')
 
| class="fem" rowspan="2" | mare (''fem'')
 
| class="fem" rowspan="2" | mare (''fem'')
 
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | o mar
 
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | o mar
Line 484: Line 484:
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
 
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | le miel
 
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | le miel
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
+
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | l'myi
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
+
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | le mié
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
 
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
 
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | il miele
 
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | il miele
Line 496: Line 496:
 
| colspan="14" align="center" style="font-weight: bold;" | Fifth declension
 
| colspan="14" align="center" style="font-weight: bold;" | Fifth declension
 
|-
 
|-
|style="font-weight: bold;" | ice
+
|style="font-weight: bold;" rowspan="2" | ice
| class="fem" | glacies, glaciei (''5f'')
+
| class="fem" | glaciēs, glaciēī (''5f'')
|
+
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
| class="masc" | o gelo
+
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | o gelo
| class="masc" | o xeo
+
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | o xeo
| class="masc" | el hielo
+
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | el hielo
|
+
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
|
+
| class="nogender" rowspan="2" |
| class="fem" | la glace
+
| class="fem" rowspan="2" | la glace
|
+
| class="fem" rowspan="2" | la gliaiche
|
+
| class="fem" rowspan="2" | la gllèche
| class="masc" | il glatsch
+
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | il glatsch
| class="masc" | il ghiaccio
+
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | il ghiaccio
| class="masc" | ghiacciu
+
| class="masc" rowspan="2" | ghiacciu
 +
|-
 +
| class="neut" | gelu, gelus (''4n'')
 
|-
 
|-
 
|style="font-weight: bold;" | landscape
 
|style="font-weight: bold;" | landscape
Line 520: Line 522:
 
|
 
|
 
| class="masc" | le paysage
 
| class="masc" | le paysage
|
+
| class="masc" | l'paysage
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 550: Line 552:
 
|
 
|
 
| class="fem" | l'araignée (''fem'')
 
| class="fem" | l'araignée (''fem'')
| class="masc" | l'pêtre
+
| class="masc" | l'pêtre <ref name=''pêtre''>I believe this was borrowed from Breton.</ref>
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
Line 648: Line 650:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="14" align="center" style="font-weight: bold;" | Created from adjectival forms
+
| colspan="14" align="center" style="font-weight: bold;" | Created from adjectival forms<ref name=''adjforms''>"'Abstract nouns of quality' - noun derivatives of qualitative adjectives - are normally feminine" (Posner, Rebecca.  <u>The Romance Languages</u>. Cambridge: University Press, 2002: 55).</ref>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|style="font-weight: bold;" | minute
 
|style="font-weight: bold;" | minute

Latest revision as of 03:19, 12 July 2008

Faux Genders is a perhaps misleading term referring to cognates in the Romance languages which are not consistent in grammatical gender (noun class) from one language to the next.

Following is a collection of some examples of these.

History

This project was originally started as a random exercise, with the following explanation:

Spanish and French, both being Romance languages, have a gender attribute to their nouns. Also, being related, many words have the same origin. These are called cognates. In French, cognates that don't have the same meaning as their source are called faux amis. Having studied French before Spanish, and not ever having been good at remembering what gender a given noun was in French, I found it convenient to rely on Spanish when I needed a noun's gender, since remembering a noun's gender in Spanish is as simple as learning only a few rules and a handful of exceptions. However, it turns out that not all French-Spanish cognates have the same gender, though probably well over 90% do.[1]

Here's a small compilation of exceptions that Jonathan North Washington, Hannah Beth Washington, George Martin Fell Brown, and Michael-Forest Meservy have been able to collect.

This data is now being collected for Hannah's B.A. thesis.

The Chart

Faux Genders
English Latin Romanian Portuguese Galician Spanish Catalan Occitan French Jèrriais Cotentinais Romansh Italian Sardinian
First declension
edge, border ōra, ōrae (1f) a orla la orla l'orlo (masc) oru
Second declension
nose nāsus, nāsī (2m) o nariz o nariz la nariz el nas le nez l'nez il nas il naso nasu
journey, voyage viāticus, viāticī (2m) a viagem a viaxe el viaje el viatge le voyage l'viage il viaggio
glass vitrum, vitrī (2n) o vidro o vidro el vidrio le verre l'vèrre il vaider il vetro bidru
la vitre l'vitre vetru
Third declension
ear auris, auris (3f) ureche (fem) a orelha a orella la oreja l'orella (fem) l'oreille (fem) l'ouothelle (fem) orêle (?) l'orecchio (masc)[2] orija
auricula, auriculae (1f) le orecchie
flower[3] flōs, flōris (3m) floare (fem) a flor a flor la flor la flor la fleur[4] la flieur la flleur la flur il fiore flore
înflorire (fem) fiore
colour color, colōris (3m) culoare (fem) a cor a cor el color[5] el color[6] la couleur la couleu la couoleu la colur il colore colore
colorit (neut) la color
pain dolor, dolōris (3m) durere (fem) a dor a dor el dolor el dolore[6] la douleur la douleu il dolore dolore
la dolore
bridge pōns, pontis (3m) punte (fem) a ponte a ponte el puente el pǫnt le pont l'pont la punt il ponte ponte
ponton; pod (neut.) ponti
tooth dēns, dentis (3m) dinte (masc)[7] o dente o dente el diente la dent[8] la dent la dent il dente dente
inch pollex, pollicis (3m) a polegada a polgada la pulgada le pouce l'pouce [9] pouoche (?)[10] il polesch il pollice poddighe (mannu)
blood sanguis, sanguinis (3m) sînge ("masc") o sangue o sangue la sangre la sang sang (fem) le sang l'sang il sang il sangue sanguni
sang (masc) sambene
salt sāl, salis (3m) sare (fem) o sal o sal la sal[11] la sal le sel l'sé saé (?) il sal il sale sale
labor, task, ploughing labor, labōris (3m) o lavouro o labor la labor la labor le labeur l'boulais il lavoro
le labour
dust, powder pulvis, pulveris (3m) pulbere (fem) a poeira a poeira el polvo la pols la poussière la poussiéthe; l'ponsi la polvere piuere
la poudre | class="fem" | la poudre
end fīnis, fīnis (3m, i-stem) o fim o fin el fin el fi la fin la fin la fin la fin la fine fine
la fi il fine finis
sweat sūdor, sūdōris (3m) sudoare fem) o suor o suor el sudor el suor[6] la sueur il sudore suore
la suor la suée
warmth, heat calor, calōris (3m) căldură fem) o calor o calor el calor[5] el calor[6] la chaleur il calore il calore
la calor
cloud nūbēs, nūbis (3f) nour (masc)[12] a nuvem a nube la nube el núvol le nuage l'nouage la nuaée il nivel la nuvola nue
valley vallēs, vallis (3f) o vale o val el valle[13] la vall la vallée la vallée la val la valle badde
valli
tree arbor, arboris (3f) a árvore a árbore el árbol[14] el arbre l'arbre (masc)[15] l'arbre (masc); l'bouais l'âbre (masc) l'albero (masc) árbures[16]
a(l/r)bure
art ars, artis (3f) a arte a arte el arte el arte l'art (masc)[17] l'art (masc) l'art (masc) l'arte (fem) arte
las artes l'arte (fem)
custom cōnsuētūdō, cōnsuētūdinis (3f) o costume o costume la costumbre la coutume il costume costumene
origin orīgō, orīginis (3f) origine (fem) a origem a orixe el origen[18] el origen l'origine (fem) l'origine (?) l'origine (fem) origine
hail grandō, grandinis (3f) o granizo el granizo la grêle la granella la grandine
milk lac, lactis (3n) lapte (neut) o leite o leite la leche la llet lach le lait[19] l'lait il latg il latte latte
sea mare, maris (3n) mare (fem) o mar o mar el mar[20] el mar[21] la mer[22] la mé la mé la mar il mare mare
la mar
honey mel, mellis (3n) miere (fem) o mel o mel la miel el mel le miel l'myi le mié il miele miele
la mel
Fourth declension
Fifth declension
ice glaciēs, glaciēī (5f) o gelo o xeo el hielo la glace la gliaiche la gllèche il glatsch il ghiaccio ghiacciu
gelu, gelus (4n)
landscape a paisagem a paisaxe el paisaje le paysage l'paysage il paesaggio paesaggiu
flag a bandeira a bandeira la bandera le drapeau la couleu la couoleu la bandiera
spider a aranha a araña la araña l'araignée (fem) l'pêtre [23] il ragno
Neologisms
make-up a maquiagem el maquillaje le maquillage
garage garaj (neut) a garagem o garaxe el garaje el garatge le garage la garascha
car automobil (neut) o auto el auto l'auto (masc) l'auto (fem) la vaituthe; moto (?) la qùérette; la maringote; l'éto (?) l'auto (masc) l'automobile (fem)
tomato[24] tomată o tomate o tomate el tomate el tomàquet la tomate la tanmate la tomata
edge, border bordură (fem) o bordo la bordure
yam[25] o inhame el ñame l'igname (fem) l'igname (masc)
Created from adjectival forms[26]
minute minut o minuto o minuto el minuto la minute la minnute la minute la minuta il minuto
Derived from verbs, also known as deverbal or postverbal nouns
conquest a conquista a conquista la conquista la conquète la contchête le conqùet la conquista
shelf a estante o estante el estante l'étagère (fem)

Footnotes

  1. In light of Richard V. Teschner's 1986 study ("The Genders of French and Spanish Noun Cognates: Some Statistics and a List" from The Canadian Modern Language Review, Jan. 1986: 256-66), this guesstimate can be revised. Teschner found 14,966 noun cognates between French and Spanish, of which 13,825 have the same grammatical gender; this indicates that 92.38% of French cognates with Spanish share the same gender.
  2. This is one of several irregular plural formations in Italian. More common irregular formations in Italian appear with a masculine singular noun ending in -o, which changes to a feminine noun in the plural with its ending in -a. Examples of these "plurali irregolari" are: il braccio-le braccia, il ciglio-le ciglia, il labbro-le labbra, l'uovo (m)-le uova, il dito-le dita, il riso-le risa ('laughter'), l'osso (m)-le ossa, il ginocchio-le ginocchia, etc. Interestingly enough, Polinsky and Van Everbroek inform us that lèvre in Old French was variable - sometimes masculine, sometimes feminine - while, in modern French, lèvre 'lip' is feminine (“Development of Gender Classifications: Modeling the Historical Change from Latin to French”, Language, 79.2 (Jun., 2003): 356-90). It should be further noted that la deda in dialectal Spanish (the feminine of el dedo 'the finger') refers to the thumb. This structure, along with more common/acceptable variants such as il brazo/la braza 'the arm/the fathom' (both singular grammatically and semantically) and other such pairs, demonstrates the way in which Spanish deals with the loss of the neuter, as well as semantic differences regarding size. This is discussed more thoroughly in Werner Wandersleben's article "Sobre el Femenino Aumentativo", in RLA, 19 (1981), 9-18.
  3. According to Rolhfs, the case of flōs, flōris (m) adopting questionable gender in modern Romance languages has to do with the same factors that cause abstract Latin nouns in -or from the third declension to illustrate the same sorts of issues. He cites the fact that this word in modern Romances has the semantic value of both 'flower' and 'blossom', and suggests that flōs is therefore not completely concrete. Thus, he makes a case for the classification of flōs, flōris as abstract ("Aspects du latin vulgaire examiné à travers la géographie linguistique", Travaux de Linguistique et de Litterature, 17.1 (1979), 7-25). See the footnote following fleur for a different approach.
  4. Many abstract words with the accusative singular in -ōrem became feminine in French (e.g., dolor (masc) > douleur (fem)). The nonabstract 'flower' supposedly followed suit, according to historical grammars, which appeal to analogy and abstractness. Polinsky and Van Everbroek suggest that a better explanation would be analogy to nonabstract feminine nouns in -orem that occur with high frequency, e.g., soror 'sister', and uxor 'spouse' (“Development of Gender Classifications: Modeling the Historical Change from Latin to French”, Language, 79.2 (Jun., 2003): 356-90).
  5. 5.0 5.1 According to Ralph Penny (A History of the Spanish Language, Cambridge: University Press (2002), 125), Spanish 'calor' and 'color' were usually feminine in Old Spanish but revert to masculine after the Golden Age. Penny also mentions that these two nouns remain feminine in regional speech.
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 Zenenko states that nouns ending in -ōrem (in the accusative) are generally masculine in Latin but often develop into feminine nouns in Ibero-Romance. However, in the case of Catalan, these nouns are almost exclusively masculine in the spoken language, with the feminine equivalent appearing more and more in formal writing (“Acerca de la manifestación del género de los sustantivos y adjetivos como categoría grammatical en las lenguas romances ibéricas”, Verba, 10.1 (1983): 231-247). Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "catalanella" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "catalanella" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "catalanella" defined multiple times with different content
  7. According to Perkowski and Vrabie, this fits into three different semantic groups of the uncommon masculine inanimates in Romanian. That is, it fits into the groups related to bilaterality, anatomy, and implanted and hanging verticality. Vrabie and Perkowski also mention that the structure dinte/dinṭi shows an ending pattern that occurs frequently in animate masculine nouns and in adjectives, thus containing many aspects that maintain its grammatical gender. See footnote for nuor for bibliographic information.
  8. According to Rohlfs 1979, this phenomenon can be explained thusly: la dent developed as a feminine noun due to the influence of MOLA 'molar' and was reinforced by the feminine MENS, MENTIS, which has the same structure in the declension paradigm.
  9. This is almost certainly a borrowing from French; "pouoche" is the expected Jèrriais form
  10. "Ou"(/u/) would be expected here, instead of "ouo" (/wo/).
  11. 'Sal' is feminine in Spanish except in the Northwest of Spain (Penny 125).
  12. This fits into Vrabie and Perkowski's "celestial entites" semantic category, as part the paradigm for masculine inanimate Romanian nouns. Most inanimates are neuter in Romanian. (For further information, see their article "Covert Semantic and Morphophonemic Categories in the Romanian Gender System" in the Slavic and East European Journal, 30.1 (Spring 1986): 54-67.)
  13. Old Spanish 'la val' was feminine (Penny 125).
  14. 'Árbol' was often still feminine in Old Spanish (Penny 125).
  15. According to Polinsky & Van Everbroek, the traditional view of the development of l'arbre (masc) is the following: when tree names in Latin (which were feminine and ended in -us) became masculine nouns due to their similarities with second declension masculine nouns, Old French arbor became masculine by analogy. The authors, however, believe that a more plausible explanation would be that arbor became masculine around the same time that many nonabstract Latin nouns in -ōrem became masculine in early Old French. However, the majority of such nouns started as neuter in Latin. For example, Lat. cor > OFr. coeur 'heart' (“Development of Gender Classifications: Modeling the Historical Change from Latin to French”, Language, 79.2 (Jun., 2003): 356-90).
  16. This noun appears in Gerhard Rohlf's article "Aspects du latin vulgaire examiné à travers la géographie linguistique", published in Travaux de Linguistique et de Littérature, 17.1 (1979).
  17. Old French art was of variable M/F gender (Polinsky & Van Everbroek 364).
  18. 'Origen' was feminine in Latin and Spanish until the Golden Age (Penny 125).
  19. According to Polinsky and Van Everbroek, lacte was commonly used in Late Latin and was eventually reinterpreted as standing for lactem (especially as the final -m was weakened). A masculine noun lactis could have then been formed by analogy ("Development of Gender Classifications: Modeling the Historical Change from Latin to French", Language, 79.2 (Jun., 2003), 356-90).
  20. It should be noted that Sp. mar can be either masculine or feminine. The standard is, as shown, masculine; however, in certain fixed expressions, it is feminine. E.g., Ayer había mucha mar; en alta mar; hacerse a la mar; etc. Examples are according to www.wordreference.com, accessed 27 January 2008.
  21. The two gender options refer to differences in semantic value. El mar refers to the general mass or body of water. La mar refers to a specific body of water (i.e., a named sea) or a large mass of any other kind of liquid (e.g., a sea of blood, a sea of tears, etc.).
  22. Polinsky and Van Everbroek cite Meyer-Lübke and Pope, who believe that mare changed from the neuter in Latin to the feminine in Old French by analogy with terra 'land'.
  23. I believe this was borrowed from Breton.
  24. This word is adapted from Nahuatlan tomatl (compare with the Latinate word seen in the Italian pomodoro). For further information, see William A. Read's Louisiana-French (Baton Rouge: LSU Press, 1931, pg 149).
  25. According to Read 1931, the Portuguese and Spanish forms have their origins in West African niami, niambi, and that the African forms derive from Arabic gambah, 'yam-like root' (150). The French and Italian forms are adaptations from Spanish and Portuguese. Interestingly, the Louisiana-French version is yamme and is feminine, not having suffered from Spanish influence.
  26. "'Abstract nouns of quality' - noun derivatives of qualitative adjectives - are normally feminine" (Posner, Rebecca. The Romance Languages. Cambridge: University Press, 2002: 55).


Back to Linguistic Musings