Semantic flips: Difference between revisions

From FirespeakerWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Created page with "This is a list of weird semantic reversals I've noticed. === "Citizens United" === * Originally referred to a group that was fighting for a law against corporate sponsorship ..."
 
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
* Now refers to the decision made against that group
* Now refers to the decision made against that group
* Now lots of examples of supporters of the original group using phrases like "We hate Citizens United", "[https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=498556706821979&set=a.115969958413991.17486.114517875225866&type=1 Dump Citizens United]", etc.
* Now lots of examples of supporters of the original group using phrases like "We hate Citizens United", "[https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=498556706821979&set=a.115969958413991.17486.114517875225866&type=1 Dump Citizens United]", etc.
=== "Oxford comma" ===
=== "People with a cold sound nasally" ===
=== "Pre-existing conditions" ===
* For '''people taking away protections for pre-existing conditions'''.
* "Let's hear it more for pre-existing medical conditions."
=== "Trump loss" ===
* "[https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/nov/08/democrats-trump-elections A year after devastating Trump loss, have the Democrats begun to find their way back?]" - meaning "loss to Trump"

Latest revision as of 14:54, 8 November 2025

This is a list of weird semantic reversals I've noticed.

"Citizens United"

  • Originally referred to a group that was fighting for a law against corporate sponsorship of elections
  • Now refers to the decision made against that group
  • Now lots of examples of supporters of the original group using phrases like "We hate Citizens United", "Dump Citizens United", etc.

"Oxford comma"

"People with a cold sound nasally"

"Pre-existing conditions"

  • For people taking away protections for pre-existing conditions.
  • "Let's hear it more for pre-existing medical conditions."

"Trump loss"