Comparison between Uzbek and Qaraqalpaq: Difference between revisions
Firespeaker (talk | contribs) |
Firespeaker (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 119: | Line 119: | ||
| ó || oʼmir ≈ ómir<br/>koʼz ≈ kóz<br/>boʼl- ≈ ból- ‘divide’ | | ó || oʼmir ≈ ómir<br/>koʼz ≈ kóz<br/>boʼl- ≈ ból- ‘divide’ | ||
|- | |- | ||
|rowspan="2"| o || a || och- ≈ ash- ‘open’ | |rowspan="2"| o || a || och- ≈ ash- ‘open’<br/>anor ≈ ánar<br/>dorix<u>o</u>na<br/>dárix<u>a</u>na | ||
|- | |- | ||
|rowspan="2"| á || | |rowspan="2"| á || avlod ≈ áwlát<br/>d<u>o</u>rixona<br/>d<u>á</u>rixana | ||
|- | |- | ||
|rowspan="3"| a | |rowspan="3"| a || adabiyot ≈ ádebiyat<br/>anor ≈ ánar | ||
|- | |- | ||
| a || | | a || dorixon<u>a</u><br/>dárixan<u>a</u> | ||
|- | |- | ||
|rowspan="2"| e || | |rowspan="2"| e || adabiyot ≈ ádebiyat | ||
|- | |- | ||
| e || | | e || | ||
Revision as of 00:47, 14 September 2026
Overview
Phonological differences
Where most suffixes in literary Uzbek don't change at all, suffixes in Qaraqalpaq change based on phonological factors—i.e., depending on nearby sounds.
The place where this might be most evident is Qaraqalpaq vowel harmony.
Compare the following suffix:
| meaning | Uzbek form | Qaraqalpaq form |
|---|---|---|
| Plural | -lar | -lAr |
The Uzbek form is always -lar, but in Qaraqalpaq the A character is used to represent the fact that the sound in this position can be realised in more than one way. Compare:
| meaning | Uzbek form | Qaraqalpaq form |
|---|---|---|
| ‘apple-pl’ | olma-lar | alma-lar |
| ‘camel-pl’ | tuya-lar | túye-ler |
Note that the A is sometimes ‘a’ and sometimes ‘e’, based on the last vowel of the preceding word. This isn't simply because the last vowel of the preceding word is an ‘a’ and ‘e’, respectively, but because they are back and front vowels, respectively. And it also mostly doesn't matter what intervening consonants there are. Here's the full list of Qaraqalpaq vowels and how they behave with respect to this "vowel harmony":
| vowel | front or back | example |
|---|---|---|
| i | front | tiller ‘language-pl’ |
| e | front | |
| ú | front | kúnler ‘day-pl’ |
| ó | front | kóller ‘lake-pl’ |
| á | usually front | tánlár ‘body-pl’ |
| a | back | |
| ı | back | |
| o | back | |
| u | back |
The main exception to á being front is nouns that end in á, where it acts back: gúnálar ‘sin-pl’.
[discussion of I]
[consonants: D]
[combination: G]
Morphological differences
Cases
Possession+case idiosyncracies
Differences in vocabulary
Some everyday vocabulary in Uzbek and Qaraqalpaq is significantly different:
| gloss | Uzbek | Qaraqalpaq |
|---|---|---|
| ‘but’ | ammo, biroq | biraq |
| ‘because’ | chunki | sebebi |
| ‘what’ | nima | ne |
| ‘and’ | va, ham | jáne, hám |
| ‘or’ | yoki | yamasa |
| ‘speak’ | gapir- | sóyle- |
| ‘this’ | shu, ushbu | usı |
| ‘this’ | bu | bul |
| ‘that’ | osha | sol |
| ‘that’ | u | ol |
A lot of other vocabulary can be understood as cognate, but with some sound correspondences.
Since these correspondences are the result of different sets of changes from a common shared ancestral language, as well as borrowings into different stages of the two languages at different times, there's a lot of messiness. But some common mappings can be noted.
Helpful sound correspondences
The main vowel correspondences are summarised in this table:
| Uzbek sound | Qaraqalpaq sound | examples |
|---|---|---|
| i | i | |
| ı | ||
| u | u | qul ≈ qul |
| ú | kul ≈ kúl | |
| oʼ | o | boʼl- ≈ bol- ‘be’ |
| ó | oʼmir ≈ ómir koʼz ≈ kóz boʼl- ≈ ból- ‘divide’ | |
| o | a | och- ≈ ash- ‘open’ anor ≈ ánar dorixona dárixana |
| á | avlod ≈ áwlát dorixona dárixana | |
| a | adabiyot ≈ ádebiyat anor ≈ ánar | |
| a | dorixona dárixana | |
| e | adabiyot ≈ ádebiyat | |
| e |
Some of the main consonant correspondences are summarised in this table:
| Uzbek sound | Qaraqalpaq sound | examples |
|---|---|---|
| ʼ | ğ | |
| -- | ||
| y | j | yaqin ≈ jaqın |
| y | (less common) | |
| sh | s | boshla- ≈ basla- qish ≈ qıs tish ≈ tis tosh ≈ tas |
| ch | sh | qachon ≈ qashan kecha ≈ keshe uchun ≈ ushın |